Which of the following is NOT included in the termination of an incident?

The choice that indicates the aspect not included in the termination of an incident is accurately identified. Termination of an incident typically involves processes that ensure an efficient and thorough conclusion to emergency operations. This includes conducting an incident debrief, where responders discuss the events that transpired, assess the response and overall effectiveness, and identify lessons learned. The purposeful critique, often referred to as a post-incident analysis, plays a crucial role in evaluating response operations, leading to improvements in future incidents.

Transferring command to a more appropriate authority, such as a Public Emergency Response Office (PERO), also signifies an aspect of incident termination, indicating the shift of responsibility and ensuring that proper protocols and communications are maintained as operations conclude.

On the other hand, post-incident accusations refer to assigning blame or pointing fingers regarding team actions or decisions, which is not a constructive or standard part of formal incident termination. Termination focuses on recovery, review, and improvement rather than dwelling on accusations, making this the aspect not aligned with standard practices post-incident.